Supervision in schools the perspective of supervisors

Authors

  • Veronika Brémová Faculty of Education Charles University
  • Irena Smetáčková Faculty of Education Charles University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58743/dap2024no12.345

Keywords:

Schools, teachers, professional development, supervision

Abstract

The text presents the supervisors’ view on the specifics of group supervision meetings with teachers. Supervision is a form of non-specific professional development that deepens understanding of complex pedagogical situations and, through that, strengthens the ability of (self) reflection, emotional regulation, communication, and cooperation with other teachers, etc. Through 20 interviews with supervisors working at schools, the specifics of teacher supervision groups, perceived obstacles on the part of teachers and schools, and professional dilemmas faced by the supervisors themselves were mapped out. The interviews show that supervisors believe the main challenge for teachers lies in the inadequate expectations surrounding supervision, which instils fear of control and evaluation among teachers. This concern stems from the lack of knowledge about supervision, as well as the isolated nature of teaching work and the prevalence of evaluation in schools. To ensure effective supervision, it is important to establish a safe environment in which teachers can identify their strengths and weaknesses and draw inspiration from the perspectives of others.

References

Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher Professional Development in Teaching and Teacher Education Over Ten Years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007

Barnett, B. G., Bowers, A. J., & Clouse, A. D. (2023). The effects of instructional coaching and supervision on teacher instructional practices and student achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X211073331

Birchak, B., Connor, C., Crawford, K. M., Kahn, L. H., Kaser, S., Turner, S., & Short, K. G. (1998). Teacher study groups: Building community through dialogue and reflection. National Council of Teachers of English.

Bredeson, P. V., & Johansson, O. (2000). The school principal's role in teacher professional development. Journal of in-service education, 26(2), 385-401. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580000200114

Břízová, B., & Šleisová, J. (2021). Supervize na základních školách. e-Pedagogium, 21(1), 23-35. https://doi.org/10.5507/epd.2021.013

Caplan, G. (1981). Mastery of stress: psychosocial aspects. The American journal of psychiatry. 138(4), 413-420. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.138.4.413.

Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and teacher education, 18(8), 947-967. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7.

De Lima, J. Á. (2001). Forgetting about friendship: Using conflict in teacher communities as a catalyst for school change. Journal of Educational Change, 2(2), 97-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1017509325276.

Evans, L. (2002). What is teacher development?. Oxford review of education, 28(1), 123-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980120113670.

Farrell, T. S., & Jacobs, G. M. (2016). Practicing What We Preach: Teacher Reflection Groups on Cooperative Learning. TESL-EJ, 19(4), 1-9. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296675813_Practicing_What_We_Preach_Teacher_Reflection_Groups_on_Cooperative_Learning.

Glazer, C., Abbott, L., & Harris, J. (2004). A teacher-developed process for collaborative professional reflection. Reflective Practice, 5(1), 33-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1462394032000169947.

Goldring, E. B., Grissom, J. A., & Rubenstein, R. N. (2023). Teacher evaluation and supervision: Insights from longitudinal research. Educational Policy, 37(2), 343-377. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048211023429

Guskey, T. R. (2002). professional development and teacher change. Teachers and teaching, 8(3), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512.

Harrington, J., & Jafarian, S. (2022). Mentor Teachers' Perspectives on Their Roles and Supervision. The New Educator, 18(1), 24-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2021.2019044

Harris, D. L., & Anthony, H. M. (2001). Collegiality and its role in teacher development: Perspectives from veteran and novice teachers. Teacher Development, 5(3), 371-390. doi: 10.1080/13664530100200150.

Hoffman-Kipp, P., Artiles, A. J., & Lopez-Torres, L. (2003). Beyond reflection: Teacher learning as praxis. Theory into practice, 42(3), 248-254. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4203_12

Jarzabkowski, L. M. (2002). The social dimensions of teacher collegiality. The Journal of Educational Enquiry, 3(2). 2-20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251432648_The_social_dimensions_of_teacher_collegiality.

Kaihoi, C. A., Bottiani, J. H., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2022). Teachers supporting teachers: a social network perspective on collegial stress support and emotional wellbeing among elementary and middle school educators. School Mental Health, 14(4), 1070-1085.

Kasíková, H., & Dubec, M. (2009). Teacher collaboration: from greater to lesser unknown. Studia paedagogica, 14(1), 67-86. https://www.phil.muni.cz/journals/index.php/studia-paedagogica/article/view/72.

King, M. B. (2023). Effective supervision in schools: Perceptions and practices of teachers and administrators. International Journal of Educational Management, 37(1), 196-212. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-11-2021-0475

Lazarová, B. (2005a). Osobnost učitele a rezistence vůči změně. In: Rabušicová, M. a kol. Sborník prací Filozofické fakulty brněnské univerzity: Řada pedagogická (s. 109-122). Masarykova univerzita.

Lazarová, B. (2005a). Teacher personality and resistance to change. In: Rabušicová, M. et al. Proceedings of the Faculty of Arts, University of Brno: Pedagogical Series (pp. 109-122). Masaryk University.

Lazarová, B. (2005b). Psychological aspects of teachers' professional development: resistance to change. Pedagogika, 55(2). 102-118.

Lazarová, B. (2005b). Psychologické aspekty profesionálního rozvoje učitelů: rezistence vůči změně. Pedagogika, 55(2), 102-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980120113670

Lazarová, B. (2010). Mentoring as a form of collegial support and good school strategy. Pedagogy, 60(3-4), 254-264.

Lazarová, B. (2010). Mentoring jako forma kolegiální podpory a strategie dobré školy. Pedagogika, 60(3-4), 254-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980120113670

Lazarová, B., & Cpinová, S. (2004). Kolegiální učení. K možnostem rozvoje hospitačních a supervizních setkávání učitelů. Učitelské listy: měsíčník Agentury Strom, Praha: Agentura Strom, 7(3), str. 4. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980120113670

Lazarová, B., & Prokopová, A. (2004). Teachers and their further education: some psychological aspects. Pedagogika, 54(3), 261-273.

Lazarová, B., & Prokopová, A. (2004). Učitelé a jejich další vzdělávání: k některým psychologickým aspektům. Pedagogika, 54(3), 261-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980120113670

Leonard, L., & Leonard, P. (2003). The continuing trouble with collaboration: Teachers talk. Current Issues in Education, 6(15). https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980120113670

Leonard, L., & Leonard, P. (2003). The continuing trouble with collaboration: Teachers talk. Current Issues in Education, 6(15).

Marcos, J. M., Sanchez, E., & Tillema, H. H. (2011). Promoting teacher reflection: What is said to be done. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2011.538269

Marcos, J. M., Sanchez, E., & Tillema, H. H. (2011). Promoting teacher reflection: What is said to be done. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2011.538269.

Marshall, K. (2005). It's time to rethink teacher supervision and evaluation. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(10), 727-735. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170508601004

Mayring, P. (2004). Qualitative content analysis. A Companion to Qualitative Research, 1(2), 159-176.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/215666096_Qualitative_Content_Analysis.

McComb, V., & Eather, N. (2017). Exploring the personal, social and occupational elements of teacher professional development. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(12), 60-66. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i12.2794

Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. Teachers college record, 104(4), 842-866. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170508601004

Ross, J. A., & Bruce, C. D. (2007). Teacher self-assessment: a mechanism for facilitating professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(2), 146-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.035

Sasson, B. D., & Somech, A. (2015). Observing aggression of teachers in school teams. Teachers and Teaching, 21(8), 941-957. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1005865.

Shulman, J. H. (2022). A case study of instructional supervision and its impact on teaching practices and student achievement in secondary schools. Journal of School Leadership, 32(2), 213-237. https://doi.org/10.1177/10526846211025982

Simoncini, K. M., Lasen, M., & Rocco, S. (2014). Professional dialogue, reflective practice and teacher research: Engaging early childhood pre-service teachers in collegial dialogue about curriculum innovation. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 27-44. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n1.3

Smetáčková, I., & Francová, V. (2020). Associations between perceived quality of relationships in teaching staff and burnout syndrome in primary school teachers. Studia paedagogica, 25(1), 9-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/SP2020-1-1.

Smetáčková, I., & Francová, V. (2020). Souvislosti mezi vnímanou kvalitou vztahů v pedagogických sborech a syndromem vyhoření u vyučujících základních škol. Studia paedagogica, 25(1), 9-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170508601004

Švaříček, R., Šeďová, K., Šalamounová, Z., & Sedláček, M. (2017). Jak se učitelé učí: Cestou profesního rozvoje k dialogickému vyučování. Masarykova univerzita.

Švaříček, R., Šeďová, K., Šalamounová, Z., & Sedláček, M. (2017). How teachers learn: A professional development journey towards dialogic teaching. Masaryk University.

Svendsen, B. (2016). Teachers’ experience from a school-based collaborative teacher professional development programme: reported impact on professional development. Teacher Development, 20(3), 313-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2016.1149512

Torff, B., & Sessions, D. (2008). Factors associated with teachers' attitudes about professional development. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(2), 123-133. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23479227.

Van Gyn, G. Reflective practice: The needs of professions and the promise of cooperative education. Journal of Cooperative Education, 31(2-3), 103-131.

Wiyono, B. B., Rasyad, A., & Maisyaroh. (2021). The effect of collaborative supervision approaches and collegial supervision techniques on teacher intensity using performance-based learning. SAGE Open, 11(2), 21582440211013779.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-31

How to Cite

Brémová, V., & Smetáčková, I. (2024). Supervision in schools the perspective of supervisors. Diagnostics and Consultancy in Assisting Professions, 2024(12), 26–44. https://doi.org/10.58743/dap2024no12.345